Author
|
Topic: RAGING STUPIDITY!!!!
|
|
Anakin
Retired
Member # 8
|
posted 01-10-2002 09:51 PM
Like I said in the Our President post, he's irresponsible. WHO CARES what he did after 9/11? He did nothing immediately after, he was a bumbling idiot, Rudy was our President. Any President would have risen to the challenge of this war. No offense to Republicans here, but this man is a puppet for the Republican party. He does as he's told and follows the Republican way, which is smaller government. What you republians fail to see is that in this day and age smaller government will KILL us. China will have 100 nukes pointed our way by 2015, and you wanna go all the way back to Pre World War 2 and try to win something. It's Bush's tax cut that put us where we are today, he didn't expect a war, but he got one, and because of his tax cut we have to cut things like NASA. Why NASA? It's our only hope for humanity to colonize the universe and survive the death of this earth. Bush wants us to change the scientific process, GIVE ME A FUCKING BREAK. This man is a joke, and I'll be GLAD to vote him out of office. -------------------- Support Progress
Posts: 1663 | From: Louisville, Ky/Chicago, IL | Registered: Apr 2000 | Logged: 172.168.179.220
|
|
|
|
Anakin
Retired
Member # 8
|
posted 02-16-2002 11:57 AM
quote: Excuse me, but aren't our dear Democrats the ones trying to take us back to pre-World War II? Didn't Clinton try to CUT defense spending? Wasn't Clinton the one who REFUSED to get Osama while he was within our reach?!!
Uh, no. Bush was cutting the Navy from the time he came into office. The war Bush is fighting right now is with Clinton's military, the one he built. The reason he didn't get bin Laden when he had the chance is obvious, he didn't have the political backing, and republicans along with the press would have accused him of starting something the Islamic nations that shouldn't have been started, and more backlash would occur when attacks were made by terrorists to retaliate, because security was so relaxed. quote: I'm as much in favor of good science as anyone. I plan to make science my career in fact. And I see nothing wrong with making scientists accountable for the money they spend on research--especially if taxpayers are paying for it.
Sure, scientists should be accountable for the money they spend, especially if its tax money, but science isn't cheap. NASA currently gets less than congress awarded the 9/11 victims. Why should the space program, the only program which insures the existance of humanity when the earth dies, or when an asteroid threatens the planet, be the program that is always cut? Whats funny about it is that the only thing that has to do with NASA that Bush wants increased is research for nuclear power powering the shuttles and other space stuff, *cough*ENRON*cough* -------------------- Support Progress
Posts: 1663 | From: Louisville, Ky/Chicago, IL | Registered: Apr 2000 | Logged: 172.128.231.184
|
|
|
|
|